[ClusterLabs] pacemaker-2.0.x version support on “RHEL 7” OS
Ken Gaillot
kgaillot at redhat.com
Tue Mar 9 10:33:36 EST 2021
Hi Sathish,
You don't need to go through all that trouble. Red Hat backported the
fix for that vulnerability to RHEL 7:
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5453
The pacemaker-1.1.23-1.el7_9.1 packages available in RHEL 7.9 do not
have the vulnerability.
On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 05:09 +0000, S Sathish S wrote:
> Hi Ken/Team,
>
> Thanks for the prompt response.
>
> pacemaker 2.0.2 version from upstream source we build and run on RHEL
> 7 with corosync-2.4.4 & pcs-0.9.169 software version.
>
> Due to CVE-2020-25654 high vulnerability is open on both the
> pacemaker 1.x and 2.x stream and fix is available in pacemaker 2.0.5
> version. Then pacemaker 2.0.5 version we have built from upstream
> source and run on RHEL 7 with corosync-2.4.4 & pcs-0.9.169 software
> version and found "pcs status resources" command not working and
> raised support ticket with clusterlab below response for the same.
>
> Clusterlab response : pcs-0.9 does not support pacemaker => 2.0.0.
> You can go with pcs-0.9 + corosync < 3 + pacemaker 1.x OR pcs-0.10 +
> corosync 3.x + pacemaker 2.x. Combination of corosync 2 + pacemaker 2
> is not supported in any pcs version, even though it may work to some
> degree.
>
> Ticket reference :
> https://www.mail-archive.com/users@clusterlabs.org/msg11091.html
>
> Now we are trying to build latest pcs-0.10 version from upstream
> source has runtime dependencies for ruby 2.2.0+ Which is not
> available in RHEL 7.x stream and getting compilation error , Please
> check and advise us whether pcs-0.10 is supported on RHEL 7.
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> S Sathish S
--
Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com>
More information about the Users
mailing list