[ClusterLabs] Anyone using remote-clear-port or remote-tls-port for remote CIB administration?

[Walker, Chris]

Yes, we use remote-tls-port for remote admin commands.  Perhaps we should be looking into other options?
Thanks,
Chris

From: Users <users-bounces at clusterlabs.org>
Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 at 11:41 AM
To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed <users at clusterlabs.org>
Subject: [ClusterLabs] Anyone using remote-clear-port or remote-tls-port for remote CIB administration?
Hi all,

Pacemaker has a feature allowing CIB modifications to be made from
hosts that are not cluster nodes:

https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/2.0/html-single/Pacemaker_Administration/#s-remote-connection

Does anyone actually use this? If it is being used, I have no problem
keeping it, but if not, I would like to deprecate it and eventually
drop support, to help with code maintenance.

My gut feeling is that remote administration is moving more towards
GUIs and orchestrators, and the Pacemaker feature is not particularly
useful anymore.
--
Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com>

_______________________________________________
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20210202/a2d413c2/attachment.htm>