[ClusterLabs] Anyone using remote-clear-port or remote-tls-port for remote CIB administration?

[Ken Gaillot]

On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 16:58 +0000, Walker, Chris wrote:
> Yes, we use remote-tls-port for remote admin commands.  Perhaps we
> should be looking into other options?
> Thanks,
> Chris

No, as long as people find it useful we'll keep it.

> From: Users <users-bounces at clusterlabs.org>
> Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 at 11:41 AM
> To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering
> welcomed <users at clusterlabs.org>
> Subject: [ClusterLabs] Anyone using remote-clear-port or remote-tls-
> port for remote CIB administration?
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Pacemaker has a feature allowing CIB modifications to be made from
> hosts that are not cluster nodes:
> 
> https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/2.0/html-single/Pacemaker_Administration/#s-remote-connection 
> 
> Does anyone actually use this? If it is being used, I have no problem
> keeping it, but if not, I would like to deprecate it and eventually
> drop support, to help with code maintenance.
> 
> My gut feeling is that remote administration is moving more towards
> GUIs and orchestrators, and the Pacemaker feature is not particularly
> useful anymore.
-- 
Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com>