[ClusterLabs] About the Pacemaker

T. Ladd Omar mwang911 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 23 09:20:29 EDT 2018

For the question one, I don't think   start-failure-is-fatal is good way
for me. It barely has no interval for retrying and easily leads to flooding
log output in a short time.

T. Ladd Omar <mwang911 at gmail.com> 于2018年10月23日周二 下午9:06写道:

> Hi all, I send this message to get some answers for my questions about
> Pacemaker.
> 1. In order to cleanup start-failed resources automatically, I add
> failure-timeout attribute for resources, however, the common way to trigger
> the recovery is by cluster-recheck whose interval is 15min by default. I
> wonder how lower value could I set for the cluster-recheck-interval. I had
> to let the failed resources recover somewhat quickly while little impact
> taken by the more frequent cluster-recheck.
> Or, is there another way to automatically cleanup start-failed resources ?
> 2. Is Pacemaker suitable for the Master-Slave model HA ? I had some
> productive problems when I use Pacemaker. If only one resource stopped on
> one node, should I failover all this node for the whole cluster? If not,
> the transactions from the ports on this node may fail for this failure. If
> yes, it seems to be big action for just one resource failure.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20181023/13b76c07/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Users mailing list