[Pacemaker] Pacemaker and RHEL/CENTOS 5.x compatibility ?

Stephane Robin SRobin at kivasystems.com
Thu Dec 19 09:36:31 EST 2013


This is a follow up on my previous post 'Trouble building Pacemaker from source on CentOS 5.10'
Andrew: Thanks for your pointers.

It turns out Pacemaker 1.1.10 needed more changes to build on CentOS 5.x.

  *   revert of a81d222
  *   g_timeout_add_seconds not available in libc in lib/services/services_linux.c
  *   qb_to_cs_error conflicting type definition in include/crm_internal.h
  *   Configure with --disable-fatal-warnings

This brings to my question:
Pacemaker 1.1.10 was already broken for this OS, and I'm assuming that 1.1.11 will diverge even further.

What is the official position in regard to RHEL/CENTOS 5.x support & testing ?
Are there any other person that can not afford yet to move to RHEL 6 (for whatever reason) and are interested in keeping RHEL/CENTOS 5.x compatibility ?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20131219/560912b1/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list