[ClusterLabs] Totems and Tokens and Kronosnet, oh my!
    Jan Friesse 
    jfriesse at redhat.com
       
    Thu Jul 25 08:27:17 UTC 2024
    
    
  
On 24/07/2024 01:22, Mike Holloway via Users wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> Writing up an article which is near ready to publish and I want to make sure the terms I seek to elaborate upon are as accurately conveyed as possible.
> 
> To that end, my current task is to understand "totem" vs "token" and how this relates to 
Quite user friendly description of Totem and Token is 
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/corosync-and-redundant-rings/11627
the protocol for consensus in modern Corosync (Post-RHEL 6), as distinct 
(if I grok) from the transport protocol "kronosnet".
kronosnet from corosync pov is "just" another transport protocol. 
Corosync (historically) supported udp multicast, udp unicast and 
infiniband for sending/receiving packet to/from wire. Kronosnet is used 
same way - for sending/receiving packets.
> 
> Could someone help me out by shedding light on the difference between the "token" in circulation, whether a "totem" concept of some sort is still valid, and how this all relates to modern Pacemaker-Corosync HA clusters?
There is really no difference from very high level of view.
Honza
> 
> Thanks,
> Mik
> 
> Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Manage your subscription:
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
> 
    
    
More information about the Users
mailing list