[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Samba failover and Windows access
Ulrich Windl
Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de
Thu Dec 8 02:33:33 EST 2022
>>> Dave Withheld <davewithheld at hotmail.com> schrieb am 08.12.2022 um 08:03 in
Nachricht
<SN4P221MB080999277CAF5581807C2628DE1D9 at SN4P221MB0809.NAMP221.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>:
> In our production factory, we run a 2‑node cluster on CentOS 8 with
pacemaker,
> a virtual IP, and drbd for shared storage with samba (among other services)
> running as a resource on the active node. Everything works great except
when
Did you consider using CTDB Samba and dual-primary DRBD instead? CTDB samba
replicates connection information to the nodes, so if one goes down, the other
knows about the clients...
> we fail over. All resources are moved to the other node and start just
fine,
> but Windows hosts that have connections to the samba shares all have to be
> rebooted before they can reconnect. Clients that were not connected can
> connect. We have samba configured for only SMB1 protocol and all Windows
> clients are configured to allow it.
>
> Maybe this is a question for the samba folks, but thought I'd try here first
> since it's only a problem when the other node takes over the samba resource.
> Anyone seen this problem and solved it?
More information about the Users
mailing list