[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] "Error: unable to fence '001db02a'" but It got fenced anyway
Ulrich Windl
Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de
Mon Mar 1 02:48:58 EST 2021
>>> Eric Robinson <eric.robinson at psmnv.com> schrieb am 28.02.2021 um 16:34 in
Nachricht
<SA2PR03MB5884B344F832DFAFCC422259FA9B9 at SA2PR03MB5884.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
> I just configured STONITH in Azure for the first time. My initial test went
> fine.
>
> On node 001db02a, the command...
>
> # pcs stonith fence 001db02b
>
> ...produced output...
>
> 001db02b fenced.
>
> 001db02b rebooted. After it came back up, I tried it in the other
direction.
>
> On node 001db02b, the command...
>
> # pcs stonith fence 001db02a
>
> ...produced output...
>
> Error: unable to fence '001db02a'.
>
> However, node 001db02a did get restarted!
>
> We also saw this error...
>
> Failed Actions:
> * stonith‑001db02ab_start_0 on 001db02a 'unknown error' (1): call=70,
> status=Timed Out, exitreason='',
> last‑rc‑change='Sun Feb 28 10:11:10 2021', queued=0ms, exec=20014ms
>
> When that happens, does Pacemaker take over the other node's resources, or
> not?
In case you are debugging an "unsuccessful" stonith that actually reboots the
node, you might try something likle "journalctl -f" on the node to be fenced,
just in case the last messages are not written to disk.
Generally no stonith can send a confirmation response _after_ stonith was
successful, so usually it works with timeouts (assuming the node is down n
seconds after issuing stonith to it).
>
>
> [cid:image001.png at 01D70DB2.BF2769D0]
>
> Disclaimer : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
> and intended solely for intended recipients. If you are not the named
> addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email.
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
> and might not represent those of Physician Select Management. Warning:
> Although Physician Select Management has taken reasonable precautions to
> ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
> responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or
> attachments.
More information about the Users
mailing list