[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
Thu Jan 7 03:59:27 EST 2021
Hi Ulrich,
> So you were asking for a specific section of the CIB like "cibadmin -Q -o
> status"?
No.
There is no need for a specific section of cib.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
----- Original Message -----
> From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de>
> To: users at clusterlabs.org; renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
> Cc:
> Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 17:57
> Subject: Antw: [EXT] Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
>
>>>> <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> schrieb am 07.01.2021 um 09:51
> in Nachricht
> <91782048.765666.1610009460932.JavaMail.yahoo at mail.yahoo.co.jp>:
>> Hi Steffen,
>> Hi Reid,
>>
>> The fencing history is kept inside stonith-ng and is not written to cib.
>
> So you were asking for a specific section of the CIB like "cibadmin -Q -o
> status"?
>
>> However, getting the entire cib and getting it sent will help you to
>> reproduce the problem.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Hideo Yamauchi.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Reid Wahl <nwahl at redhat.com>
>>> To: renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp; Cluster Labs - All topics related to
>> open-source clustering welcomed <users at clusterlabs.org>
>>> Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 17:39
>>> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi, Steffen. Those attachments don't contain the CIB. They contain
> the `pcs
>
>> config` output. You can get the cib with `pcs cluster cib >
>> $(hostname).cib.xml`.
>>>
>>>
>>> Granted, it's possible that this fence action information
> wouldn't be in the
>
>> CIB at all. It might be stored in fencer memory.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:26 AM <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp>
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Steffen,
>>>>
>>>>> Here CIB settings attached (pcs config show) for all 3 of my
> nodes
>>>>> (all 3 seems 100% identical), node03 is the DC.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the attachment.
>>>>
>>>> What is the scenario when this situation occurs?
>>>> In what steps did the problem appear when fencing was performed (or
> failed)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Hideo Yamauchi.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: Steffen Vinther Sørensen <svinther at gmail.com>
>>>>> To: renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp; Cluster Labs - All topics
> related to
>> open-source clustering welcomed <users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>> Cc:
>>>>> Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 17:05
>>>>> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs
> status
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Hideo,
>>>>>
>>>>> Here CIB settings attached (pcs config show) for all 3 of my
> nodes
>>>>> (all 3 seems 100% identical), node03 is the DC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Steffen
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:06 AM
> <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Steffen,
>>>>>> Hi Reid,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also checked the Centos source rpm and it seems to
> include a fix for
> the
>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As Steffen suggested, if you share your CIB settings, I
> might know
>>>>> something.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If this issue is the same as the fix, the display will
> only be
> displayed on
>>
>>>>> the DC node and will not affect the operation.
>>>>>> The pending actions shown will remain for a long time, but
> will not
> have a
>>>>> negative impact on the cluster.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Hideo Yamauchi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> > From: Reid Wahl <nwahl at redhat.com>
>>>>>> > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source
> clustering
>>>>> welcomed <users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>> > Cc:
>>>>>> > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:58
>>>>>> > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions
> shown in pcs
> status
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > It's supposedly fixed in that version.
>>>>>> > -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787749
>>>>>> > - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4713471
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > So you may be hitting a different issue (unless
> there's a bug in
>>>>> the
>>>>>> > pcmk 1.1 backport of the fix).
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I may be a little bit out of my area of knowledge
> here, but can you
>>>>>> > share the CIBs from nodes 1 and 3? Maybe Hideo,
> Klaus, or Ken has
> some
>>>>>> > insight.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:53 PM Steffen Vinther
> Sørensen
>>>>>> > <svinther at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Hi Hideo,
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> If the fix is not going to make it into the
> CentOS7 pacemaker
>>>>> version,
>>>>>> >> I guess the stable approach to take advantage of
> it is to build
>>>>> the
>>>>>> >> cluster on another OS than CentOS7 ? A little
> late for that in
>>>>> this
>>>>>> >> case though :)
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Regards
>>>>>> >> Steffen
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 7:27 AM
> <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Hi Steffen,
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > The fix pointed out by Reid is affecting
> it.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Since the fencing action requested by the
> DC node exists
>>>>> only in the
>>>>>> > DC node, such an event occurs.
>>>>>> >> > You will need to take advantage of the
> modified pacemaker to
>>>>> resolve
>>>>>> > the issue.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>>>>>> >> > Hideo Yamauchi.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> >> > > From: Reid Wahl
> <nwahl at redhat.com>
>>>>>> >> > > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related
> to open-source
>>>>> clustering
>>>>>> > welcomed <users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>> >> > > Cc:
>>>>>> >> > > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:07
>>>>>> >> > > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending
> Fencing Actions
>>>>> shown in pcs
>>>>>> > status
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > Hi, Steffen. Are your cluster nodes
> all running the
>>>>> same
>>>>>> > Pacemaker
>>>>>> >> > > versions? This looks like Bug 5401[1],
> which is fixed
>>>>> by upstream
>>>>>> >> > > commit df71a07[2]. I'm a little
> bit confused about
>>>>> why it
>>>>>> > only shows
>>>>>> >> > > up on one out of three nodes though.
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > [1]
> https://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5401
>>>>>> >> > > [2]
>>>>> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/df71a07
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:31 AM Steffen
> Vinther Sørensen
>>>>>> >> > > <svinther at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> Hello
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> node 1 is showing this in
> 'pcs status'
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> Pending Fencing Actions:
>>>>>> >> > >> * reboot of
> kvm03-node02.avigol-gcs.dk pending:
>>>>>> > client=crmd.37819,
>>>>>> >> > >> origin=kvm03-node03.avigol-gcs.dk
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> node 2 and node 3 outputs no such
> thing (node 3 is
>>>>> DC)
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> Google is not much help, how to
> investigate this
>>>>> further and
>>>>>> > get rid
>>>>>> >> > >> of such terrifying status message
> ?
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> Regards
>>>>>> >> > >> Steffen
>>>>>> >> > >>
> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >> > >> Manage your subscription:
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> ClusterLabs home:
> https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > --
>>>>>> >> > > Regards,
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > Reid Wahl, RHCA
>>>>>> >> > > Senior Software Maintenance Engineer,
> Red Hat
>>>>>> >> > > CEE - Platform Support Delivery -
> ClusterHA
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > >
> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >> > > Manage your subscription:
>>>>>> >> > >
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > ClusterLabs home:
> https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >> > Manage your subscription:
>>>>>> >> >
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > ClusterLabs home:
> https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >> Manage your subscription:
>>>>>> >>
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Reid Wahl, RHCA
>>>>>> > Senior Software Maintenance Engineer, Red Hat
>>>>>> > CEE - Platform Support Delivery - ClusterHA
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > Manage your subscription:
>>>>>> > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Manage your subscription:
>>>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Manage your subscription:
>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Reid Wahl, RHCA
>>>
>>> Senior Software Maintenance Engineer, Red Hat
>>> CEE - Platform Support Delivery - ClusterHA
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Manage your subscription:
>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>
More information about the Users
mailing list