[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: [Off-topic] Message threading (Was: Antw: [EXT] Re: Two node cluster and extended distance/site failure)

[Ulrich Windl]

>>> Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar at gmail.com> schrieb am 29.06.2020 um 17:13 in
Nachricht <a9b3fa14-65bc-c683-7e83-3bd1c6edade6 at gmail.com>:
> 29.06.2020 14:57, Ulrich Windl пишет:
>>>>> Klaus Wenninger <kwenning at redhat.com> schrieb am 29.06.2020 um 10:12 in
>> Nachricht
>> 
>> [...]
>>> My mailer was confused by all this combinations of
>>> "Antw: Re: Antw:" anddidn't compose mails into a
>>> thread properly. Which is why I missed further
>>> discussion where it was definitely still about
>>> shared-storage and notwatchdog fencing.
>> [...]
>> 
>> Some remarks: I never liked translations of mail headers, and specifically

> the translation of "Re:", but any decent MUA thould thread messages based on

> "In-Reply-To:" (or "References:"), not on the subject. (RFC 5230, "5.8. 
> In-Reply-To and References")
> 
> 
> Fine.
> 
> Original message:
> 
> Message-ID:
> <CACLi31XRhAm41CczAS9yoHadd+y6ByBTt7YWXrF_fP4FFv147Q at mail.gmail.com>
> 
> Your reply:
> 
> In-Reply-To:
>
<31558_1593436561_5EF9E991_31558_332_1_CACLi31XRhAm41CczAS9yoHadd+y6ByBTt7YWX
> rF_fP4FFv147Q at mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for the hint! It seems out IT staff implemented some "security feature"
that changes the Message-ID for incoming messages.
I'm asking for a fix...

> 
> 
> Last thread "Suggestions for multiple NFS mounts as LSB script".
> _______________________________________________
> Manage your subscription:
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> 
> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/