[ClusterLabs] [Off-topic] Message threading (Was: Antw: [EXT] Re: Two node cluster and extended distance/site failure)

[Andrei Borzenkov]

29.06.2020 14:57, Ulrich Windl пишет:
>>>> Klaus Wenninger <kwenning at redhat.com> schrieb am 29.06.2020 um 10:12 in
> Nachricht
> 
> [...]
>> My mailer was confused by all this combinations of
>> "Antw: Re: Antw:" anddidn't compose mails into a
>> thread properly. Which is why I missed further
>> discussion where it was definitely still about
>> shared-storage and notwatchdog fencing.
> [...]
> 
> Some remarks: I never liked translations of mail headers, and specifically the translation of "Re:", but any decent MUA thould thread messages based on "In-Reply-To:" (or "References:"), not on the subject. (RFC 5230, "5.8. In-Reply-To and References")


Fine.

Original message:

Message-ID:
<CACLi31XRhAm41CczAS9yoHadd+y6ByBTt7YWXrF_fP4FFv147Q at mail.gmail.com>

Your reply:

In-Reply-To:
<31558_1593436561_5EF9E991_31558_332_1_CACLi31XRhAm41CczAS9yoHadd+y6ByBTt7YWXrF_fP4FFv147Q at mail.gmail.com>


Last thread "Suggestions for multiple NFS mounts as LSB script".