[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Q: Recommened directory for RA auxillary files?

[Ken Gaillot]

On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 10:09 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:54:50 +0200
> "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
> 
> > > > > Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com> schrieb am 03.09.2019 um
> > > > > 16:35 in  
> > 
> > Nachricht
> > <979978d5a488aabd9ed4a941ff4eac60c271c84d.camel at redhat.com>:
> > > On Mon, 2019‑09‑02 at 15:23 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:  
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > Are there any recommendations where to place (fixed content)
> > > > files an
> > > > RA uses?
> > > > Usually my RAs use a separate XML file for the metadata, just
> > > > to
> > > > allow editing it in XML mode automatically.
> > > > Traditionally I put the file in the same directory as the RA
> > > > itself
> > > > (like "cat $0.xml" for meta‑data).
> > > > Are there any expectations that every file in the RA directory
> > > > is an
> > > > RA?
> > > > (Currently I'm extending an RA, and I'd like to provide some
> > > > additional user‑modifiable template file, and I wonder which
> > > > path to
> > > > use)
> > > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Ulrich  
> > > 
> > > I believe most (maybe even all modern?) deployments have both lib
> > > and
> > > resource.d under /usr/lib/ocf. If you have a custom provider for
> > > the RA
> > > under resource.d, it would make sense to use the same pattern
> > > under
> > > lib.  
> > 
> > So what concrete path are you suggesting?
> > /usr/lib/<something>/<vendor>?
> 
> I would bet on /usr/lib/ocf/lib/<vendor> ?

That was what I had in mind. Parallels "heartbeat"
-- 
Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com>