[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Q: Recommened directory for RA auxillary files?

[Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais]

On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:54:50 +0200
"Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:

> >>> Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com> schrieb am 03.09.2019 um 16:35 in  
> Nachricht
> <979978d5a488aabd9ed4a941ff4eac60c271c84d.camel at redhat.com>:
> > On Mon, 2019‑09‑02 at 15:23 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:  
> >> Hi!
> >> 
> >> Are there any recommendations where to place (fixed content) files an
> >> RA uses?
> >> Usually my RAs use a separate XML file for the metadata, just to
> >> allow editing it in XML mode automatically.
> >> Traditionally I put the file in the same directory as the RA itself
> >> (like "cat $0.xml" for meta‑data).
> >> Are there any expectations that every file in the RA directory is an
> >> RA?
> >> (Currently I'm extending an RA, and I'd like to provide some
> >> additional user‑modifiable template file, and I wonder which path to
> >> use)
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> Ulrich  
> > 
> > I believe most (maybe even all modern?) deployments have both lib and
> > resource.d under /usr/lib/ocf. If you have a custom provider for the RA
> > under resource.d, it would make sense to use the same pattern under
> > lib.  
> 
> So what concrete path are you suggesting? /usr/lib/<something>/<vendor>?

I would bet on /usr/lib/ocf/lib/<vendor> ?