[ClusterLabs] [pacemaker] Discretion with glib v2.59.0+ recommended

Jan Pokorný jpokorny at redhat.com
Mon Jan 21 07:23:08 EST 2019

On 21/01/19 09:17 +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> IMHO it's like in Perl: When relying the hash keys to be returned
> in any particular (or even stable) order, the idea is just broken!
> Either keep the keys in an extra array for ordering, or sort them 
> in some way...

Exactly, IT silos lacking well-educated influencers/mainstream are
doomed to repeat these glitches ... just consider the Python ecosystem
some years after Perl already recovered from the very underlying
issue: https://bugs.python.org/issue13703#msg151691
(and regarding this "mainstream", keep in mind that scripting
languages like these have substantially lower barriers to entry,
C inherently expects some respect and knowledge).


Jan (Poki)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190121/d0d69f55/attachment-0002.sig>

More information about the Users mailing list