[ClusterLabs] [pacemaker] Discretion with glib v2.59.0+ recommended
jpokorny at redhat.com
Mon Jan 21 12:23:08 UTC 2019
On 21/01/19 09:17 +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> IMHO it's like in Perl: When relying the hash keys to be returned
> in any particular (or even stable) order, the idea is just broken!
> Either keep the keys in an extra array for ordering, or sort them
> in some way...
Exactly, IT silos lacking well-educated influencers/mainstream are
doomed to repeat these glitches ... just consider the Python ecosystem
some years after Perl already recovered from the very underlying
(and regarding this "mainstream", keep in mind that scripting
languages like these have substantially lower barriers to entry,
C inherently expects some respect and knowledge).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Users