[ClusterLabs] Antwort: Re: corosync/dlm fencing?
philipp.achmueller at arz.at
Thu Jul 26 08:14:21 EDT 2018
"Users" <users-bounces at clusterlabs.org> schrieb am 19.07.2018 21:44:42:
> Von: Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com>
> An: users at clusterlabs.org
> Datum: 19.07.2018 21:46
> Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync/dlm fencing?
> Gesendet von: "Users" <users-bounces at clusterlabs.org>
> On 19/07/18 17:25 +0200, Philipp Achmüller wrote:
> > "Users" <users-bounces at clusterlabs.org> schrieb am 18.07.2018
> >> if it's unclear, 0.17.2 as the lowest version that's fixed
> > following version is currently installed with SP3:
> > libqb0-1.0.1-2.15.x86_64
> Then the only blind bet is that this patch to libqb might have helped:
> The issue that patch fixes might still fit the overall picture.
ok - there isn't any release including this fix right now?
> Other than that, it might also have been some kind of system overload
> that prevented corosync responding to its peers in a timely fashion,
> for instance.
No, when Problem occurs i do not see any kind of system overload
> Jan (Poki)
> [Anhang "attdrxae.dat" gelöscht von Philipp Achmüller/ARZ/AT]
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Users