[ClusterLabs] corosync/dlm fencing?

Jan Pokorný jpokorny at redhat.com
Thu Jul 19 15:44:42 EDT 2018

On 19/07/18 17:25 +0200, Philipp Achmüller wrote:
> "Users" <users-bounces at clusterlabs.org> schrieb am 18.07.2018 15:46:09:
>> if it's unclear, 0.17.2 as the lowest version that's fixed
> following version is currently installed with SP3:
> libqb0-1.0.1-2.15.x86_64

Then the only blind bet is that this patch to libqb might have helped:

The issue that patch fixes might still fit the overall picture.

Other than that, it might also have been some kind of system overload
that prevented corosync responding to its peers in a timely fashion,
for instance.

Jan (Poki)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180719/eefa83cc/attachment-0002.sig>

More information about the Users mailing list