[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Changes coming in Pacemaker 2.0.0

[Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais]

On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:04:35 +0100
Kristoffer Grönlund <kgronlund at suse.com> wrote:

> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr at dalibo.com> writes:
> 
> >
> > For what is worth, while using crmsh, I always have to explain to
> > people or customers that:
> >
> > * we should issue an "unmigrate" to remove the constraint as soon as the
> >   resource can get back to the original node or get off the current node if
> >   needed (depending on the -inf or +inf constraint location issued)
> > * this will not migrate back the resource if it's sticky enough on the
> > current node. 
> >
> > See:
> > http://clusterlabs.github.io/PAF/Debian-8-admin-cookbook.html#swapping-master-and-slave-roles-between-nodes
> >
> > This is counter-intuitive, indeed. I prefer the pcs interface using
> > the move/clear actions.  
> 
> No need! You can use crm rsc move / crm rsc clear. In fact, "unmove" is
> just a backwards-compatibility alias for clear in crmsh.

Thanks for the tip! I'll update the docs next week.