[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Changes coming in Pacemaker 2.0.0

[Kristoffer Grönlund]

Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr at dalibo.com> writes:

>
> For what is worth, while using crmsh, I always have to explain to
> people or customers that:
>
> * we should issue an "unmigrate" to remove the constraint as soon as the
>   resource can get back to the original node or get off the current node if
>   needed (depending on the -inf or +inf constraint location issued)
> * this will not migrate back the resource if it's sticky enough on the current
>   node. 
>
> See:
> http://clusterlabs.github.io/PAF/Debian-8-admin-cookbook.html#swapping-master-and-slave-roles-between-nodes
>
> This is counter-intuitive, indeed. I prefer the pcs interface using
> the move/clear actions.

No need! You can use crm rsc move / crm rsc clear. In fact, "unmove" is
just a backwards-compatibility alias for clear in crmsh.

Cheers,
Kristoffer

>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>

-- 
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronlund at suse.com