[ClusterLabs] Resources still retains in Primary Node even though its interface went down

[pillai bs]

Thanks Ken Gaillot,
I will try configuring the resources to monitor and update. Thank you.

Regards,
Madhan.B


On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 05/18/2017 07:54 AM, pillai bs wrote:
> > Hi Ken Gaillot,
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply.
> > No i didnt configured any thing to monitor the resources.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Madhan.B
>
> Pacemaker has the built-in capability to monitor resources, but it
> doesn't do that unless you tell it to. Without a monitor, Pacemaker will
> never know when a resource has failed.
>
> How you configure a monitor depends on whether you use crm shell, pcs,
> or whatever, but basically you just specify that you want to create an
> operation for the resource of type "monitor" with some interval (such as
> 30 seconds).
>
>
> > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com
> > <mailto:kgaillot at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 05/12/2017 09:43 AM, pillai bs wrote:
> >     > Thank you for the Prompt reply.
> >     > I have one more question.sorry it might be silly. but am wondering
> after
> >     > noticed this.
> >     >  I made that interface down <NO carrier> but how the ip
> address(Public)
> >     > & VIP (IP resource) are still in primary node.
> >     > If i made interface down, public IP address also have to go down
> right?
> >     >
> >     > Regards,
> >     > pillai.bs <http://pillai.bs> <http://pillai.bs>
> >
> >     Did you configure a monitor operation on the IP address resources?
> >
> >     > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com
> <mailto:kgaillot at redhat.com>
> >     > <mailto:kgaillot at redhat.com <mailto:kgaillot at redhat.com>>> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     On 05/03/2017 02:43 AM, pillai bs wrote:
> >     >     > Hi Experts!!!
> >     >     >
> >     >     >               Am having two node setup for HA
> >     (Primary/Secondary) with
> >     >     > separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known
> the
> >     >     Expected
> >     >     > behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary
> >     has to take
> >     >     > in-charge (meaning initially the VIP will point the primary
> >     node, so
> >     >     > user can access home/data/logs from primary node.Once
> >     primary node
> >     >     went
> >     >     > down, the VIP/floatingIP will point the secondary node so
> >     that the
> >     >     user
> >     >     > can experienced uninterrupted service).
> >     >     >              I'm using dual ring support to avoid split
> >     brain. I have
> >     >     > two interfaces (Public & Private).Intention for having
> private
> >     >     interface
> >     >     > is for Data Sync alone.
> >     >     >
> >     >     > I have tested my setup in two different ways:
> >     >     > 1. Made primary Interface down (ifdown eth0), as expected
> >     VIP and
> >     >     other
> >     >     > resources moved from primary to secondary node.(VIP will not
> be
> >     >     > reachable from primary node)
> >     >     > 2. Made Primary Interface down (Physically unplugged the
> >     Ethernet
> >     >     > Cable). The primary node still retain the resources,
> >     >     VIP/FloatingIP was
> >     >     > reachable from primary node.
> >     >     >
> >     >     > Is my testing correct?? how come the VIP will be reachable
> >     even though
> >     >     > eth0 was down. Please advice!!!
> >     >     >
> >     >     > Regards,
> >     >     > Madhan.B
> >     >
> >     >     Sorry, didn't see this message before replying to the other
> one :)
> >     >
> >     >     The IP resource is successful if the IP is up *on that host*.
> >     It doesn't
> >     >     check that the IP is reachable from any other site. Similarly,
> >     >     filesystem resources just make sure that the filesystem can be
> >     mounted
> >     >     on the host. So, unplugging the Ethernet won't necessarily
> >     make those
> >     >     resources fail.
> >     >
> >     >     Take a look at the ocf:pacemaker:ping resource for a way to
> >     ensure that
> >     >     the primary host has connectivity to the outside world. Also,
> >     be sure
> >     >     you have fencing configured, so that the surviving node can
> >     kill a node
> >     >     that is completely cut off or unresponsive.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170526/705c30e1/attachment-0002.html>