[ClusterLabs] Need bash instead of /bin/sh

[Jan Pokorný]

On 24/09/15 08:10 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com> schrieb am 23.09.2015 um 22:30 in
> Nachricht <20150923203005.GA10123 at redhat.com>:
>> On 23/09/15 15:38 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>> In times of BASH it's hard to get POSIX shell documentation.
>> 
>> Oh, really?
>> 
>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html 
> 
> Thanks for the pointer! What I wanted to says is: When reading the BASH
> documentation, it's increasingly hard to find out what is POSIX and what iS
> BASHism.

Can only agree, especially when POSIX conformance switches for Bash are
not strict/powerful enough.  This probably explains demand for tools like
checkbashisms.

-- 
Jan (Poki)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150929/0d1db26b/attachment-0002.sig>