[ClusterLabs] Fwd: [Pacemaker] One node thinks everyone is online, but the other node doesn't think so
Dmitry Koterov
dmitry.koterov at gmail.com
Tue Mar 10 11:27:52 EDT 2015
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>
> > I have a 3-node cluster where node1 and node2 are running
> corosync+pacemaker and node3 is running corosync only (for quorum).
> Corosync 2.3.3, pacemaker 1.1.10. Everything worked fine the first couple
> of days.
> >
> > Once upon a time I discovered the following situation: node2 thinks that
> both node1 and node2 are online, but node1 thinks that node2 is down. Could
> you please say: how could it be? There are no connectivity problems between
> the nodes at the moment (maybe they were, but why the system hasn't
> recovered?).
>
> The logs show connectivity problems occurring, so no doubt there.
> As to why it hasn't recovered, first check corosync - if it does not have
> a consistent view of the world pacemaker has no hope.
> Alternatively, I recall there was a bug that could be preventing this in
> your version. So if corosync looks fine, perhaps try an upgrade.
Thanks.
Are you talking about this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libqb/+bug/1341496 ?
I believe I reproduced the problem one more time (it's very unstable), the
symptoms were the following:
1. Once upon a time node2 became down.
2. The last message from corosync at node1 was "Quorum lost" (I suspect
there was a temporary misconnection with node3).
3. Then, in a couple of days, at node3 "service corosync stop" hanged (only
killall -9 helps). I tried to run strace during the service is stopping, it
shows:
[pid 19449] futex(0x7f580b4c62e0, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 0, NULL <unfinished
...>
[pid 19448] --- SIGQUIT {si_signo=SIGQUIT, si_code=SI_USER, si_pid=28183,
si_uid=0} ---
[pid 19448] write(6, "\3\0\0\0", 4) = 4
[pid 19448] rt_sigreturn() = 360
... <and repeats for 19448 again and again>
where pstree shows:
init,1
├─corosync,19448
│ └─{corosync},19449
4. As well as at node1: "service corosync stop" hangs at node1 too with
same symptoms, only killall -9 helps.
5. Restarting corosync & pacemaker at node1 and node2 solved the problem.
Could you please say is it related to the above bug in libqb?
> > The "crm status" is below. What other logs should I attach for the
> diagnostics?
> >
> > Also, "service corosync stop" on node1 hangs forever with no additional
> lines in logs, so I cannot even stop the service. (But after "service
> corosync stop" on node1 the node node2 starts thinking that node1 is
> offline, although the command still hangs.)
> >
> >
> > root at node2:~# crm status
> > Current DC: node1 (1760315215) - partition with quorum
> > 2 Nodes configured
> > 6 Resources configured
> > Online: [ node1 node2 ]
> > Master/Slave Set: ms_drbd [drbd]
> > Masters: [ node2 ]
> > Slaves: [ node1 ]
> > Resource Group: server
> > fs (ocf::heartbeat:Filesystem): Started node2
> > postgresql (lsb:postgresql): Started node2
> > bind9 (lsb:bind9): Started node2
> > nginx (lsb:nginx): Started node2
> >
> >
> > root at node1:/var/log# crm status
> > Current DC: node1 (1760315215) - partition with quorum
> > 2 Nodes configured
> > 6 Resources configured
> > Online: [ node1 ]
> > OFFLINE: [ node2 ]
> > Master/Slave Set: ms_drbd [drbd]
> > Masters: [ node1 ]
> > Stopped: [ node2 ]
> > Resource Group: server
> > fs (ocf::heartbeat:Filesystem): Started node1
> > postgresql (lsb:postgresql): Started node1
> > bind9 (lsb:bind9): Started node1
> > nginx (lsb:nginx): Started node1
> > Failed actions:
> > drbd_promote_0 (node=node1, call=634, rc=1, status=Timed Out,
> last-rc-change=Thu Jan 22 10:30:08 2015, queued=20004ms, exec=0ms): unknown
> error
> >
> >
> > A part of "crm configure show":
> >
> > property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \
> > dc-version="1.1.10-42f2063" \
> > cluster-infrastructure="corosync" \
> > stonith-enabled="false" \
> > last-lrm-refresh="1421250983"
> > rsc_defaults $id="rsc-options" \
> > resource-stickiness="100"
> >
> >
> > Also I see in logs on node1 (maybe they're related to the issue, maybe
> not):
> >
> > Jan 22 10:14:02 node1 pengine[2772]: warning: pe_fence_node: Node node2
> is unclean because it is partially and/or un-expectedly down
> > Jan 22 10:14:02 node1 pengine[2772]: warning: determine_online_status:
> Node node2 is unclean
> > Jan 22 10:14:02 node1 pengine[2772]: warning: stage6: Node node2 is
> unclean!
> > Jan 22 10:14:02 node1 pengine[2772]: warning: stage6: YOUR RESOURCES
> ARE NOW LIKELY COMPROMISED
> > Jan 22 10:14:02 node1 pengine[2772]: error: stage6: ENABLE STONITH TO
> KEEP YOUR RESOURCES SAFE
> >
> >
> > On node2 the logs are:
> >
> > Jan 22 10:13:57 node2 corosync[32761]: [TOTEM ] A new membership (
> 188.166.54.190:6276) was formed. Members left: 1760315215 13071578
> > Jan 22 10:13:57 node2 crmd[311]: notice: peer_update_callback: Our
> peer on the DC is dead
> > Jan 22 10:13:57 node2 crmd[311]: notice: do_state_transition: State
> transition S_NOT_DC -> S_ELECTION [ input=I_ELECTION
> cause=C_CRMD_STATUS_CALLBACK origin=peer_update_callback ]
> > Jan 22 10:13:57 node2 corosync[32761]: [QUORUM] This node is within the
> non-primary component and will NOT provide any services.
> > Jan 22 10:13:57 node2 corosync[32761]: [QUORUM] Members[1]: 1017525950
> > Jan 22 10:13:57 node2 crmd[311]: notice: pcmk_quorum_notification:
> Membership 6276: quorum lost (1)
> > Jan 22 10:13:57 node2 crmd[311]: notice: crm_update_peer_state:
> pcmk_quorum_notification: Node (null)[13071578] - state is now lost (was
> member)
> > Jan 22 10:13:57 node2 crmd[311]: notice: crm_update_peer_state:
> pcmk_quorum_notification: Node node1[1760315215] - state is now lost (was
> member)
> > Jan 22 10:13:57 node2 pacemakerd[302]: notice:
> pcmk_quorum_notification: Membership 6276: quorum lost (1)
> > Jan 22 10:13:57 node2 pacemakerd[302]: notice: crm_update_peer_state:
> pcmk_quorum_notification: Node node1[1760315215] - state is now lost (was
> member)
> > Jan 22 10:13:57 node2 pacemakerd[302]: notice: crm_update_peer_state:
> pcmk_quorum_notification: Node (null)[13071578] - state is now lost (was
> member)
> > Jan 22 10:13:57 node2 corosync[32761]: [MAIN ] Completed service
> synchronization, ready to provide service.
> > Jan 22 10:14:01 node2 corosync[32761]: [TOTEM ] A new membership (
> 104.236.71.79:6288) was formed. Members joined: 1760315215 13071578
> > Jan 22 10:14:02 node2 crmd[311]: error: pcmk_cpg_membership: Node
> node1[1760315215] appears to be online even though we think it is dead
> > Jan 22 10:14:02 node2 crmd[311]: notice: crm_update_peer_state:
> pcmk_cpg_membership: Node node1[1760315215] - state is now member (was lost)
> > Jan 22 10:14:03 node2 corosync[32761]: [QUORUM] This node is within the
> primary component and will provide service.
> > Jan 22 10:14:03 node2 corosync[32761]: [QUORUM] Members[3]: 1760315215
> 13071578 1017525950
> > Jan 22 10:14:03 node2 crmd[311]: notice: pcmk_quorum_notification:
> Membership 6288: quorum acquired (3)
> > Jan 22 10:14:03 node2 pacemakerd[302]: notice:
> pcmk_quorum_notification: Membership 6288: quorum acquired (3)
> > Jan 22 10:14:03 node2 pacemakerd[302]: notice: crm_update_peer_state:
> pcmk_quorum_notification: Node node1[1760315215] - state is now member (was
> lost)
> > Jan 22 10:14:03 node2 corosync[32761]: [MAIN ] Completed service
> synchronization, ready to provide service.
> > Jan 22 10:14:03 node2 crmd[311]: notice: corosync_node_name: Unable to
> get node name for nodeid 13071578
> > Jan 22 10:14:03 node2 crmd[311]: notice: crm_update_peer_state:
> pcmk_quorum_notification: Node (null)[13071578] - state is now member (was
> lost)
> > Jan 22 10:14:03 node2 pacemakerd[302]: notice: corosync_node_name:
> Unable to get node name for nodeid 13071578
> > Jan 22 10:14:03 node2 pacemakerd[302]: notice: crm_update_peer_state:
> pcmk_quorum_notification: Node (null)[13071578] - state is now member (was
> lost)
> > Jan 22 10:14:03 node2 crmd[311]: warning: do_log: FSA: Input
> I_JOIN_OFFER from route_message() received in state S_ELECTION
> > Jan 22 10:14:04 node2 crmd[311]: notice: do_state_transition: State
> transition S_ELECTION -> S_PENDING [ input=I_PENDING cause=C_FSA_INTERNAL
> origin=do_election_count_vote ]
> > Jan 22 10:14:05 node2 attrd[310]: notice: attrd_local_callback:
> Sending full refresh (origin=crmd)
> > Jan 22 10:14:05 node2 attrd[310]: notice: attrd_trigger_update:
> Sending flush op to all hosts for: master-drbd (10000)
> > Jan 22 10:14:05 node2 attrd[310]: notice: attrd_trigger_update:
> Sending flush op to all hosts for: probe_complete (true)
> > Jan 22 10:14:05 node2 crmd[311]: notice: do_state_transition: State
> transition S_PENDING -> S_NOT_DC [ input=I_NOT_DC cause=C_HA_MESSAGE
> origin=do_cl_join_finalize_respond ]
> > Jan 22 10:15:11 node2 corosync[32761]: [TOTEM ] A new membership (
> 104.236.71.79:6296) was formed. Members left: 13071578
> > Jan 22 10:15:14 node2 corosync[32761]: [TOTEM ] A new membership (
> 128.199.116.218:6312) was formed. Members joined: 13071578 left:
> 1760315215
> > Jan 22 10:15:17 node2 corosync[32761]: [TOTEM ] A new membership (
> 104.236.71.79:6324) was formed. Members joined: 1760315215
> > Jan 22 10:15:19 node2 crmd[311]: notice: peer_update_callback: Our
> peer on the DC is dead
> > Jan 22 10:15:19 node2 crmd[311]: notice: do_state_transition: State
> transition S_NOT_DC -> S_ELECTION [ input=I_ELECTION
> cause=C_CRMD_STATUS_CALLBACK origin=peer_update_callback ]
> > Jan 22 10:15:20 node2 kernel: [690741.179442] block drbd0: peer( Primary
> -> Secondary )
> > Jan 22 10:15:20 node2 corosync[32761]: [QUORUM] Members[3]: 1760315215
> 13071578 1017525950
> > Jan 22 10:15:20 node2 corosync[32761]: [MAIN ] Completed service
> synchronization, ready to provide service.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> >
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150310/976dcd52/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list