[Pacemaker] [Problem][pacemaker1.0] The "probe" may not be carried out by difference in cib information of "probe".

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Wed May 14 02:46:56 EDT 2014

On 14 May 2014, at 3:53 pm, renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> Thank you for comments.
>> Do you guys have any timeframe for moving away from 1.0.x?
>> The 1.1 series is over 4 years old now and quite usable :-)
>> There is really a (low) limit to how much effort I can put into support for it.
> We gradually move from Pacemaker1.0 to Pacemaker1.1, too.
> I thought that I should record that there was this problem with Pacemaker1.0.
> And I registered a problem and reported it.
> (possibly the user who is behind with a shift to Pacemaker1.1 may encounter the same problem.)
> It is not necessary at all to revise it for Pacemaker1.0.

Maybe we need to add KnownIssues.md to the repo for anyone thats slow to update.
Are there any 1.0 bugs that really really need fixing or shall we move them all to the KnownIssues file?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20140514/d68a7b16/attachment-0003.sig>

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list