[Pacemaker] why does pacemaker execute fence action immediately when the target node becomes UNCLEAN?

Digimer lists at alteeve.ca
Thu Jan 3 12:43:03 EST 2013

On 01/03/2013 06:21 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-01-02T14:19:09, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote:
>> I suspect that, if you tested it, you would see that corosync fails over
>> to the second ring when the first ring's bond breaks/recovers. Same in
>> reverse. So you're protected against bond=!1 by that second layer of
>> redundancy.
>> In my testing, only mode=1 was able to fail and recover without failing
>> the totem ring.
> What's wrong with mode=3?
> Regards,
>     Lars

I'd have to rerun my tests to sort out why a given mode failed. In my
experience though, all others failed either when a member failed or, in
some cases, it survived the failure but dropped on recovery.

I should run the tests again and document it this time.

Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list