[Pacemaker] why does pacemaker execute fence action immediately when the target node becomes UNCLEAN?

Lars Marowsky-Bree lmb at suse.com
Thu Jan 3 06:21:27 EST 2013

On 2013-01-02T14:19:09, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote:

> I suspect that, if you tested it, you would see that corosync fails over
> to the second ring when the first ring's bond breaks/recovers. Same in
> reverse. So you're protected against bond=!1 by that second layer of
> redundancy.
> In my testing, only mode=1 was able to fail and recover without failing
> the totem ring.

What's wrong with mode=3?


Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list