[Pacemaker] crmsh: New syntax for location constraints, suggestions / comments

Vladislav Bogdanov bubble at hoster-ok.com
Fri Dec 13 17:11:17 EST 2013

13.12.2013 15:39, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-12-13T13:11:30, Rainer Brestan <rainer.brestan at gmx.net> wrote:
>> Please do not merge colocation and order together in a way that only none or
>> both is present.
> This was never the plan.
> The idea was to offer an additional construct that provides both
> properties, since *most of the time*, that's what users want. In the
> interest of clarity and brevity in the configuration, this would be
> quite useful.


> That they are also useful on their own remains unchallenged. I was the
> one who proposed that originally ;-)
> Regards,
>     Lars

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list