[Pacemaker] crmsh: New syntax for location constraints, suggestions / comments

Lars Marowsky-Bree lmb at suse.com
Fri Dec 13 07:39:08 EST 2013

On 2013-12-13T13:11:30, Rainer Brestan <rainer.brestan at gmx.net> wrote:

> Please do not merge colocation and order together in a way that only none or
> both is present.

This was never the plan.

The idea was to offer an additional construct that provides both
properties, since *most of the time*, that's what users want. In the
interest of clarity and brevity in the configuration, this would be
quite useful.

That they are also useful on their own remains unchallenged. I was the
one who proposed that originally ;-)


Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list