[Pacemaker] fencing best practices for virtual environments

Lars Marowsky-Bree lmb at suse.com
Sun Sep 9 15:53:42 EDT 2012


On 2012-09-09T13:30:36, Alberto Menichetti <albmenichetti at tai.it> wrote:

> I've successfully configured and tested the stonith plugin
> "external/vcenter"; but this plugin introduces a single point of
> failure in my cluster infrastructure because it depends on the
> availability of the virtual center (which is, in the customer
> environment, a virtual machine).

It's not exactly a single point of failure, since you need two failures
for this to matter - the first failure being the one that causes the
fence, and a second one for the vcenter instance to be down at that
time.

> I was thinking to introduce an additional fencing device, to be used
> when the virtual center is unavailable; is this a suggested
> deployment?
> The fecing device I'd like to use is sdb.

If you have a working SBD setup, you do not need the external/vcenter
plugin any more.


Regards,
    Lars

-- 
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde





More information about the Pacemaker mailing list