[Pacemaker] Last chance to object to the syntax for cluster tickets (multi-site clusters)

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Mon Feb 27 06:04:32 EST 2012

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Florian Haas <florian at hastexo.com> wrote:
> On 02/27/12 11:31, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Florian Haas <florian at hastexo.com> wrote:
>>> On 02/27/12 06:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>> Excellent, now that we have Florian's blessing I can merge this today.
>>> You seem to operate on a very interesting definition of "blessing."
>> "I can't think of a better idea, maybe someone else can" isn't enough
>> to hold it up at this point.
> I'm not arguing with that; it's just not a blessing and I don't think
> that I'm required nor entitled to issuing one.
> However, just like resource templates, this is another example where it
> wouldn't have hurt anyone if this had been discussed on a _public_
> mailing list while it was in the making. Just sayin'.

And I'm just sayin' that its been in the "staging" schema for 7 months
to allow time for discussion.
There appears to have been sufficient discussion that people are
actively using it, and I believe SUSE has had it documented for some
time now.
So the information has been there.

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list