[Pacemaker] Last chance to object to the syntax for cluster tickets (multi-site clusters)

Florian Haas florian at hastexo.com
Mon Feb 27 05:42:23 EST 2012

On 02/27/12 11:31, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Florian Haas <florian at hastexo.com> wrote:
>> On 02/27/12 06:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> Excellent, now that we have Florian's blessing I can merge this today.
>> You seem to operate on a very interesting definition of "blessing."
> "I can't think of a better idea, maybe someone else can" isn't enough
> to hold it up at this point.

I'm not arguing with that; it's just not a blessing and I don't think
that I'm required nor entitled to issuing one.

However, just like resource templates, this is another example where it
wouldn't have hurt anyone if this had been discussed on a _public_
mailing list while it was in the making. Just sayin'.


Need help with High Availability?

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list