[Pacemaker] A question and demand to a resource placement strategy function

[Yuusuke IIDA]

Hi Yan,

I tested the correction.

The problem that I reported was improved by the correction that you performed.

When I tested it, I found a different problem.

When I set "placement-strategy=default", it is a problem that a function to 
disperse does not commit placement by the number of the start resource.

When this problem applies the patch which I affixed it to, it is settled.

Is the correction with this patch right?

Best Regards,
Yuusuke IIDA

(2011/04/27 13:32), Yan Gao wrote:
> Hi Yuusuke,
>
> On 04/19/11 19:55, Yan Gao wrote:
>> Actually I've been optimizing the placement-strategy lately. It will
>> sort the resource processing order according to the priorities and
>> scores of resources. That should result in ideal placement. Stay tuned.
> The improvement of the placement strategy has been committed into the
> devel branch. Please give it a test. Thanks!
>
> Regards,
>    Yan

-- 
----------------------------------------
METRO SYSTEMS CO., LTD

Yuusuke Iida
Mail: iidayuus at intellilink.co.jp
----------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: allocate.c.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 894 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20110512/9703a623/attachment-0002.bin>