[Pacemaker] First confused (then enlightened ? :)

[Florian Haas]

On 2011-02-14 22:37, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof @ 14/02/2011 05:44 -0300 dixit:
>>> -Is still the case that Heartbeat is not to be considered for new
>>> deployments ? (I read something along that line)
>>
>> pretty much
>>
>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/FAQ#Should_I_Run_Pacemaker_on_Heartbeat_or_Coroysnc.3F
>>
> 
> That was the place I was referring to. Still, the thing is pretty
> confusing. DR-BD talks about heartbeat in its description.

Happy to take a patch for the User's Guide.

> When
> you install pacemaker using package managers, heartbeat is in the
> dependency list. And goes on...

Only on Debian/Ubuntu, which has a dependency on corosync OR heartbeat
-- something that many other distros don't even support --, all of which
is to make rolling upgrades from the previous major release possible --
something that no other distro supports.

Florian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20110215/0d55a09e/attachment-0003.sig>