[Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster

[Patrick H.]

Yes.

P.S. Dont remove the mailing list from the recipients. Bad etiquette :-)



Sent: Thu Dec 01 2011 14:50:21 GMT-0700 (MST)
From: Charles DeVoe <scarecrow_57 at yahoo.com>
To: Patrick H. <pacemaker at feystorm.net>
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
> That document says to remove the pacemaker plugin.  Should I start 
> pacemaker as a service?
>
> --- On *Thu, 12/1/11, Patrick H. /<pacemaker at feystorm.net>/* wrote:
>
>
>     From: Patrick H. <pacemaker at feystorm.net>
>     Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
>     To: "Charles DeVoe" <scarecrow_57 at yahoo.com>,
>     pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>     Date: Thursday, December 1, 2011, 4:22 PM
>
>     Yes, the original documentation you came across that talks about
>     CMAN :-)
>     http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/ch08s02.html
>     Though you dont need the gfs stuff if youre not going to be using gfs
>
>
>
>     Sent: Thu Dec 01 2011 14:00:44 GMT-0700 (MST)
>     From: Charles DeVoe <scarecrow_57 at yahoo.com>
>     </mc/compose?to=scarecrow_57 at yahoo.com>
>     To: Patrick H. <pacemaker at feystorm.net>
>     </mc/compose?to=pacemaker at feystorm.net>
>     Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
>>     Is there some documentation on how to set up option 3?
>>
>>     corosync + cpg + cman + mcp
>>
>>     Do I simply start up pacemaker????
>>     Also, what is cpg?
>>
>>     --- On *Thu, 12/1/11, Patrick H. /<pacemaker at feystorm.net>
>>     </mc/compose?to=pacemaker at feystorm.net>/* wrote:
>>
>>
>>         From: Patrick H. <pacemaker at feystorm.net>
>>         </mc/compose?to=pacemaker at feystorm.net>
>>         Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
>>         To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
>>         <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
>>         </mc/compose?to=pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
>>         Cc: "Charles DeVoe" <scarecrow_57 at yahoo.com>
>>         </mc/compose?to=scarecrow_57 at yahoo.com>
>>         Date: Thursday, December 1, 2011, 1:52 PM
>>
>>         Sent: Thu Dec 01 2011 11:34:39 GMT-0700 (MST)
>>         From: Charles DeVoe <scarecrow_57 at yahoo.com>
>>         To: pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>         Subject: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
>>>         I've spent the last month or so building linux clusters.  2
>>>         of them in a VM environment on fedora 15.  I went through
>>>         the Clusters from Scratch Tutorial; which sort of worked. 
>>>         At this time I am looking for a sanity check.
>>>
>>>         My requirements are  to have  a 4 node load balanced cluster
>>>         with shard access to a SAN volume.  The SAN will be using GFS2.
>>>
>>>          I believe I need corosync, Openais, PaceMaker, and GFS2
>>>         utilities.
>>>
>>>         Where the confusion is coming from is the use of CMAN in the
>>>         clusters from scratch.  It seems from what I am reading that
>>>         Pacemaker should be able to do everything I need and I am
>>>         wondering if the use of cman is old information.
>>>
>>>         Any thoughts comments or suggestiosn are greatly
>>>         appreciated, Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>         No, CMAN is the new information. Theres a nasty bug out there
>>         (see
>>         http://www.mail-archive.com/openais@lists.linux-foundation.org/msg05600.html)
>>         if you setup pacemaker 1.1 without the new MCP stuff. Best
>>         solution is to switch to CMAN. See
>>         http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/907043024/introducing-the-pacemaker-master-control-process-for
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20111201/ccc90910/attachment-0003.html>