[Pacemaker] [RPMs] clusterlabs.org and epel-6 ?

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Mon Aug 15 00:35:45 EDT 2011

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Marco van Putten
<marco.vanputten at tudelft.nl> wrote:
>> I don't believe there is any need for additional RPMs.  Pacemaker
>> should already be in CentOS6
> For example we're running Redhat on an academic licence and don't have a
> subscription for the HA channel. It would be very welcome to have RPM's from
> Clusterlabs.

After some discussions with various interested parties, I've written
up the situation and some possible solutions on the wiki:

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list