[Pacemaker] Manging Virtual Machine's resource

Nitin nitin at atc.tcs.com
Mon May 19 05:06:16 EDT 2008

On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 10:18 +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2008-05-19T13:34:16, Nitin <nitin at atc.tcs.com> wrote:
> > I have small idea. Should we create a new policy under which we can
> > define container resources (such as VMs). These container resources in
> > turn can house other resources say "contained resources". Contained
> > resources may have collocation/dependency constraints too. 
> > 
> > This way CRM would be aware of contained resources and will run them
> > only on their containers.
> > 
> > Does it make sense to you??
> This makes sense and is pretty well understood, alas it is not "small"
> and not that easily done - otherwise, we'd have it already ;-)
Idea was small not the consequences. ;-)

But if someone can guide me then I am ready to take up the task. I am
ready to invest 3-5 weeks. Please advise how to start/where to start. 

> Regards,
>     Lars

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list