[Pacemaker] Manging Virtual Machine's resource

Lars Marowsky-Bree lmb at suse.de
Mon May 19 04:18:13 EDT 2008

On 2008-05-19T13:34:16, Nitin <nitin at atc.tcs.com> wrote:

> I have small idea. Should we create a new policy under which we can
> define container resources (such as VMs). These container resources in
> turn can house other resources say "contained resources". Contained
> resources may have collocation/dependency constraints too. 
> This way CRM would be aware of contained resources and will run them
> only on their containers.
> Does it make sense to you??

This makes sense and is pretty well understood, alas it is not "small"
and not that easily done - otherwise, we'd have it already ;-)


Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list