[Pacemaker] CRM and openAIS

Andrew Beekhof beekhof at gmail.com
Fri Jan 11 14:45:48 EST 2008

On Jan 11, 2008, at 7:49 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:

> On 2008-01-11T18:54:21, Andrew Beekhof <beekhof at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> they're in heartbeat-resources
>>>> though i'm not 100% sure breaking them out into their own package  
>>>> is a
>>>> good idea.  thoughts?
>>> I'm kind of disagree. Without them CRM is almost useless,
>> well in theory the Red Hat (or anyone else) could supply their own  
>> set of
>> RAs which could be used instead
> They belong into heartbeat-resources, that's fine.
>>> so I'd put them into pacemaker-openais.
>> Even if I wanted to (which I'm not convinced I do), there are  
>> political
>> problems with doing so and we would start having double maintenance  
>> issues.
>> If anything, I'd merge heartbeat-resources with heartbeat-common.
> No, I think they should remain separate. Clearly they don't belong  
> into
> pacemaker-ais, as they can be used w/o pacemaker as well.
> (I know this is not your interest, but for the Linux HA project in
> "legacy mode" it matters, once Alan gets over the split itself.)

Just to be clear, if that was directed at me, I agree that they should  
not be part of pacemaker (which is why they are not part of the source  
Apologies if "which I'm not convinced I do" wasn't clear enough in  
that respect - I was merely playing devil's advocate.

And I tend to agree about them being in heartbeat-resources... though  
its largely an academic point anyway.

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list