[Pacemaker] RFC: What part of the XML configuration do you hate the most?

Satomi Taniguchi taniguchis at intellilink.co.jp
Thu Aug 21 22:23:26 EDT 2008

Hi Dejan and Lars,

All right, I agree with you.
Only "max-consecutive-failures" is unsafe
in the case every other monitor operation failed, indeed.

And only "max-failures-per-period" is unsafe too.
(In the case monitor function itself takes long time)

Well then, I would like to confirm the specifications.
(i)3 settings should be added.
  - max-consecutive-failures:
	Maximum times in a row a monitor may fail,
	Default value -> 1
  - period-length:
	Period in seconds to count monitor failures,
	Set to zero to disable,
	Default value -> 0
  - max-failures-per-period:
	Maximum times per period a monitor may fail,
	Default value -> 1

(ii)When a condition matches even either "consecutive" or "per-period",
lrmd notifies its client that the failure occurs.

Do you have any comments?
I'm trying to implement above.

Best Regards,
Satomi Taniguchi

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list