[Pacemaker] RFC: What part of the XML configuration do you hate the most?

Lars Marowsky-Bree lmb at suse.de
Mon Aug 11 18:45:18 EDT 2008

On 2008-08-11T23:44:59, Dejan Muhamedagic <dejanmm at fastmail.fm> wrote:

> > > > 	max-total-failures (how many times a monitor may fail)
> > > > 	max-consecutive-failures (how many times in a row a monitor may fail)
> >
> > I think that only the second one is enough.
> > The first one requires the time dimension as you wrote.
> Indeed.
> > It confuses users to add many new complex settings.
> Agreed. But sometimes it's necessary ;-)

Yes, and I agree that just the second one would not suffice.

I think we need two settings; "period-length" and

I hope these two speak for themselves; if they don't, I failed. ;-)


Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list