[ClusterLabs Developers] [HA] future of OpenStack OCF resource agents (was: resource-agents v4.2.0)

Kristoffer Grönlund kgronlund at suse.de
Wed Oct 24 10:22:52 EDT 2018

On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 14:42 +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 01:25:54PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > No doubt I've missed some pros and cons here.  At this point
> > personally I'm slightly leaning towards keeping them in the
> > openstack-resource-agents - but that's assuming I can either hand
> > off
> > maintainership to someone with more time, or somehow find the time
> > myself to do a better job.
> > 
> > What does everyone else think?  All opinions are very welcome,
> > obviously.
> Well, I can just comment that with all the python agents coming in,
> the resource-agents package is getting a bit heavy on the
> dependencies
> (at least in Debian) so we might decide to split it at some point in
> the future.

Do you mean additional python module dependencies, or that the
dependency on python itself seems like added weight? Because since
python is a dependency of pacemaker as well as both crmsh, pcs and
fence-agents already, it really shouldn't make a difference.


More information about the Developers mailing list