[ClusterLabs Developers] New LVM resource agent name (currently LVM-activate)

Jan Pokorný jpokorny at redhat.com
Wed Nov 22 18:07:25 EST 2017

On 22/11/17 15:28 -0600, David Teigland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 03:08:19PM -0600, David Teigland wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 02:34:31PM -0600, Chris Feist wrote:
>>> lvm2:
>>> Good - It's obvious it's a newer/better version of the lvm agent.
>>> Bad - It may be associated with the lvm2 commands which we are working on
>>> phasing out.
>> Unfortunately, the lvm project used the name "lvm2" to mean something
>> different, so giving a new meaning to the "lvm" vs "lvm2" distinction
>> would be confusing.
> If nobody else finds this confusing, then don't let this get in the way of
> doing lvm2.
>> lvmvg or lvmlv or lvm_vg/lvm_lv
> I don't mind these.  Another idea is "lvm_agent", "lvm_ra".  I don't have
> a strong opinion about any of them.

What about VolumeGroup (in the tradition of Filesystem, for instance)?

Or why not shoot for an LVM merge (plus proper versioning to tell
the difference)?

Jan (Poki)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20171123/7039fb07/attachment-0003.sig>

More information about the Developers mailing list