[ClusterLabs Developers] New LVM resource agent name (currently LVM-activate)
jpokorny at redhat.com
Wed Nov 22 18:07:25 EST 2017
On 22/11/17 15:28 -0600, David Teigland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 03:08:19PM -0600, David Teigland wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 02:34:31PM -0600, Chris Feist wrote:
>>> Good - It's obvious it's a newer/better version of the lvm agent.
>>> Bad - It may be associated with the lvm2 commands which we are working on
>>> phasing out.
>> Unfortunately, the lvm project used the name "lvm2" to mean something
>> different, so giving a new meaning to the "lvm" vs "lvm2" distinction
>> would be confusing.
> If nobody else finds this confusing, then don't let this get in the way of
> doing lvm2.
>> lvmvg or lvmlv or lvm_vg/lvm_lv
> I don't mind these. Another idea is "lvm_agent", "lvm_ra". I don't have
> a strong opinion about any of them.
What about VolumeGroup (in the tradition of Filesystem, for instance)?
Or why not shoot for an LVM merge (plus proper versioning to tell
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Developers