[ClusterLabs Developers] New LVM resource agent name (currently LVM-activate)
zren at suse.com
Thu Nov 23 03:54:41 EST 2017
> What about VolumeGroup (in the tradition of Filesystem, for instance)?
In the LVM-activate, we will support both all VG activation and only one
activation depending on the parameters.
> Or why not shoot for an LVM merge (plus proper versioning to tell
> the difference)?
You mean merging LVM-activate with the existing LVM? Here was a long
discussion about that:
More information about the Developers