[ClusterLabs Developers] [libqb] heads-up: logging not working with binutils-2.29 standard linker (ld.bfd)
Valentin Vidic
Valentin.Vidic at CARNet.hr
Thu Aug 3 14:50:52 EDT 2017
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 07:23:20PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> Yep, the same issue, because of compiling pacemaker with the same
> fancy linker that decided to hide those symbols without notices,
> I guess.
>
> Can you somehow scrape the number of project in Debian that
> suffer from __{start,stop}_<section> symbols missing? That might
> help to convince binutils maintainers there's something wrong.
I only found a few recent bugs related to binutils 2.29, so it
doesn't seem to be widespread for now, but I will ask when the
next full rebuild of the archive might happen.
> Iterim non-production-ready solution (e.g. equivalent of Fedora
> Rawhide):
> - use patch(es) from
> https://github.com/jnpkrn/libqb/commits/workaround-ld-2.29
> above "Doc tweaking (#261)"
> - short path: generate and grab "qblog.t", build pacemaker
> (and possibly other dependants) with LDFLAGS=<path to qblog.t>,
> - longer proper path:
> . build updated libqb with that
> . rebuild pacemaker on top of that rebuilt libqb
> (hopefully it uses pkconfig and hopefuly the patched
> libqb.pc will be OK, untested)
>
> Proper solution:
> - give me few days to investigate better ways to deal with this
> fancy linker, it will likely differ from the iterim one above
> (so far, I had quite miserable knowledge of linker script and
> other internals, getting better but not without headaches);
> we should also ensure there's a safety net because realizing
> there are logs missing when they are expected the most
> ... priceless
Thank you for the effort. There is no rush here, we just won't
be able to upload new version to Debian unstable.
--
Valentin
More information about the Developers
mailing list