[Pacemaker] Someone using ibmrsa-telnet external stonith plugin?

[Florian Haas]

On 03/25/2010 10:28 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Florian Haas <florian.haas at linbit.com>
> Gesendet: 25.03.2010 16:23:59
> An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Someone using ibmrsa-telnet external stonith plugin?
> 
>> On 03/25/2010 04:09 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> is there someone using the external stonith plugin 'ibmrsa-telnet'?
>>>
>>> I found some issues introduced by modifications of other contributors
>>> in the currect version.
>> Such as?
> 
> a) ha_log.sh is used to send debug messages. It is called as bash command line
> without escaping dangerous characters. This leads to unwanted file creation
> in the directory /var/lib/heartbeat/cores/root/    (replicateable)

Ack.

> b) The regex pattern for the expect command don't match. So the communication
> doesn't work as originally intended. I contacted the contributor of that piece
> of code. He found that error early after his contribution, but the error correction
> went to /dev/null somehow.

Crap. Well still, thanks for being persistent.

Split into two changesets and pushed. Please, as a general rule, when
you make more than one logical change, send more than one patch. It
makes tracking down issues a whole lot easier if we can actually use hg
bisect for what it's good for.

>> I am beginning to believe that everyone should start using IPMI, and
>> spare themselves of these proprietary out-of-band nightmares.
> 
> There are some questions regarding this:
> a) Has anyone made experiences with using IPMI through the stack running
> on the OS. If I understand it right then OpenIPMI provides this kind of
> in-band-communication. My understanding of STONITH was that there has
> to be a way to kill a node WITHOUT a dependency on the node's health.
> Is it safe to use the IPMI interface provided by a daemon running in the OS
> of the node I want to shoot?

I never use this, and only rely on out-of-band IPMI for obvious reasons.

> b) The newer IMM supports IPMI through the out-bound-communication
> over the IMM ip address. RSA II does not have this option as far as I know
> (updates welcome) what has been the reason for writing this telnet-beast.  ;-)

OK, I see.

> c) Which stonith agent is the "better" one 'ipmilan' or 'external/ipmi'?

"Yes".

I tend to prefer external/ipmi.

Cheers,
Florian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20100326/963be845/attachment-0003.sig>