[Pacemaker] A function demand of the new environment.

[renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp]

Hi Dejan,

> respawn is supported in Heartbeat. Or did you want to say
> OpenAIS?

Yes. 
I know that the support of respawn was performed in Heartbeat. 
If respawn is supported, I think that either is good.

However, I think that form such as new respawn service is necessary when I support it in Corosync.
In addition, the developer of Corosync does not wish processes increase.

Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.



--- Dejan Muhamedagic <dejanmm at fastmail.fm> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:03:14PM +0900, renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > We test a shift to new environment(Corosync+Pacemaker...) now.
> > 
> > A demand was discussed by the next email.
> > 
> > * http://marc.info/?l=openais&m=124615212603435&w=2
> > 
> > Our many users use respawn.
> > These many users feel a problem in moving the function of respawn in new environment.
> > In addition, many users are not ready to shift in respawn.
> > 
> > Support of respawn is necessary to shift to new environment.
> > The support of respawn lets many hesitating users shift.
> > 
> > We think the start by respawn to be the method that had better be realized in Pacemaker in the
> same
> > way as GUI.
> > 
> > Will you think about the realization of the function like
> > respawn supported in Heartbeat in new environment?
> 
> respawn is supported in Heartbeat. Or did you want to say
> OpenAIS?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dejan
> 
> > 
> > * I recognize that respawn is a provisional function in Heartbeat. 
> > * However, many users use it.
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Hideo Yamauchi.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list
> > Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>