<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Nur Text Zchn";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
span.NurTextZchn
{mso-style-name:"Nur Text Zchn";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Nur Text";
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 2.0cm 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="DE" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoPlainText">Hi!<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US">I wonder (thinking "utilization"): The types of resources are quite different (like a VM vs. an IP address), so wouldn't it make sense to be able to define classes of resources that you can limit (or not) regarding
parallel execution?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US">The current utilization mechanism cannot be used, because it uses "static allocation", that is the score is based on where resources are running. For concurrency the score would have to be based on "dynamic allocation",
i.e.: the score should be based on the resource operations currently (or planned to run) in progress.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US">So "resource heavy (slow)" resources could be assigned a high dynamic utilization value, while "light resources" could be assigned a small value. Depending on the nodes a basic value could be assigned to limit the
number of resource operations *per node*, but not globally.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US">Maybe some clever mind want to suggest something very smart...
</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Segoe UI Emoji",sans-serif">😉</span><span lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US">Kind regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US">Ulrich<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="mso-fareast-language:DE">-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Users <users-bounces@clusterlabs.org> On Behalf Of Knauf Steffen<br>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 4:24 PM<br>
To: users@clusterlabs.org<br>
Subject: [EXT] [ClusterLabs] Limit the number of resources starting/stoping in parallel possible?</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">Hi,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">we have multiple Cluster (2 node + quorum setup) with more then 100 Resources ( 10 x VIP + 90 Microservices) per Node.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">If the Resources are stopped/started at the same time the Server is under heavy load, which may result into timeouts and an unresponsive server.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">We configured some Ordering Constraints (VIP --> Microservice). Is there a way to limit the number of resources starting/stoping in parallel?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">Perhaps you have some other tips to handle such a situation.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">Thanks & greets<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">Steffen<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>