[ClusterLabs] Problem with constraint definition field 'with-rsc-role="Master"'

Tomas Jelinek tojeline at redhat.com
Fri Apr 11 09:28:51 UTC 2025


Hi Vitaly,

New role names are supported in CIB schema 3.7. If your CIB hasn't been 
updated to at least that version of the schema, then pcs has no choice 
other than to put the old role names into CIB.

To see your CIB schema version, run 'pcs cluster cib | head' and check 
the value of validate-with attribute of the root xml element.

To update CIB to a newer schema, run 'pcs cluster cib-upgrade'.

Regards,
Tomas

Dne 10. 04. 25 v 14:31 vitaly napsal(a):
> Hi Tomas.
> Thank you very much for clarification.
> The only reason I worry is that the script that I am running is 
> supposed to run on the client systems. After the "fix" where I remove 
> old constraints and create new ones I run another check to confirm 
> that old settings are gone and will not cause any issues after upgrade.
> If this check comes back with old values I am issuing a warning that 
> configuration "may" need to be updated.
> Below is condensed list of commands I use to replace the old with new.
> In any case, if pcs constraints list always shows new values I could 
> use it instead of cibadmin to verify correct values.
> pcs constraint colocation remove DBMaster postgres-ms
> pcs constraint colocation remove DBSlave postgres-ms
> pcs constraint colocation add DBMaster with Promoted postgres-ms 
> INFINITY id=colocation-  DBMaster-postgres-ms-Promoted
> pcs constraint colocation add DBSlave with Promoted postgres-ms 
> "-10000" id=colocation-     DBSlave-postgres-ms-Promoted
> pcs resource op delete postgres-monitor-interval-5s
> pcs resource op add postgres monitor interval=5s timeout=300s 
> on-fail=restart role=Promoted
>
> Thank you very much for your help!
> _Vitaly
>> On 04/10/2025 5:17 AM EDT Tomas Jelinek <tojeline at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Vitaly,
>>
>> You don't need to worry much about this.
>>
>> When pcs is editing CIB, it prefers using the new role names and 
>> automatically falls back to the old role names based on pacemaker / 
>> CIB schema version. When pcs is printing the configuration, it does a 
>> reverse transformation and prints the new role names even if CIB 
>> contains the old ones.
>>
>> Pacemaker 2.1, which pcs 0.11 is compatible with, is capable of 
>> handling both old and new role names.
>>
>> If you want to get rid of the old role names, you may replace them in 
>> CIB ('pcs cluster edit') or drop the constraints and recreate them 
>> using pcs. If it fails, you maybe have an old CIB version. You can 
>> update that with 'pcs cluster cib-upgrade'.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tomas
>>
>> Dne 09. 04. 25 v 20:35 vitaly napsal(a):
>>> Hello,
>>> I have dual node clusters with postgres as one of the resources.
>>> The clusters were upgraded from pcs v 0.10 to pcs v 0.11.
>>> Pcs V 0.11 eliminated Master role and replaced it with Promoted.
>>> For clusters that were upgraded I needed to remove old configuration 
>>> for colocation because with old one in place while creating new one 
>>> commit of the configuration was failing due to duplicate constraint.
>>> Update works fine on all the clusters but on one of them AFTER 
>>> UPGRADE I see different output in “cibadmin --query” and in “pcs 
>>> constraint list”
>>> The constraints in “cibadmin –query” are showing:
>>> <rsc_colocation rsc="DBSlave" with-rsc="postgres-ms" score="-10000" 
>>> rsc-role="Started" with-rsc-role="Master" 
>>> id="colocation-DBSlave-postgres-ms-Promoted"/>
>>> <rsc_colocation rsc="DBMaster" with-rsc="postgres-ms" 
>>> score="INFINITY" rsc-role="Started" with-rsc-role="Master" 
>>> id="colocation-DBMaster-postgres-ms-Promoted"/>
>>> Same constraints in “pcs constraint list” were showing:
>>> Colocation Constraints:
>>> Started resource 'DBSlave' with Promoted resource 
>>> 'postgres-ms' score=-10000
>>> Started resource 'DBMaster' with Promoted resource 
>>> 'postgres-ms' score=INFINITY
>>> On all other systems “cibadmin –query” is in agreement with pcs and 
>>> shows:
>>> <rsc_colocation rsc="DBSlave" with-rsc="postgres-ms" score="-10000" 
>>> rsc-role="Started" with-rsc-role="Promoted" 
>>> id="colocation-DBSlave-postgres-ms-Promoted"/>
>>> <rsc_colocation rsc="DBMaster" with-rsc="postgres-ms" 
>>> score="INFINITY" rsc-role="Started" with-rsc-role="Promoted" 
>>> id="colocation-DBMaster-postgres-ms-Promoted"/>
>>> So my problem is in with-rsc-role showing “Master” on a single 
>>> system and “Promoted” on all others.
>>> Would appreciate it if anybody could shed some light on the issue.
>>> Thank you very much!
>>> _Vitaly
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Manage your subscription:
>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>> ClusterLabs home:https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Manage your subscription:
>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20250411/5f44ba31/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list