[ClusterLabs] MySQL cluster with auto failover
Antony Stone
Antony.Stone at ha.open.source.it
Wed Sep 6 06:39:54 EDT 2023
On Wednesday 06 September 2023 at 11:23:54, Damiano Giuliani wrote:
> Thanks for helping.
>
> Because I still don't know which version will be provided, probably MySQL
> enterprise or community.
I believe both support Galera replication.
> I was wondering about pacemaker because I know quite well how it works and
> I need a vip/automatic failover
I regard a VIP as being entirely independent of replicating database content.
> Galera seems a different approach that I have to study and test estensively
> before place in production, instead pacemaker is a well know solution to
> me.
Yes, but if you are trying to replicate database content, how does pacemaker
help with this? Pacemaker can quite happily provide you with a floating
virtual IP address which is guarenteed to be on one of your database servers,
but it doesn't (as far as I know) have any mechanism for replicating the
database content between those servers.
> Is drbd approach obsolete or solid?
I would say that DRBD is a solid solution provided you only have two nodes and
they have very good connectivity between them.
However, replicating the data at disk level is a very different matter from
having a DBMS such as MySQL understanding what is on the disk (and for that
matter, what it has cached in RAM).
> About the degraded status I read on web there is a specific configuration?
I cannot comment on that; maybe someone else can.
> There is also a good Galera documentation to study?
I used https://mariadb.com/kb/en/getting-started-with-mariadb-galera-cluster
Antony.
--
"In fact I wanted to be John Cleese and it took me some time to realise that
the job was already taken."
- Douglas Adams
Please reply to the list;
please *don't* CC me.
More information about the Users
mailing list