[ClusterLabs] 99-VirtualDomain-libvirt.conf under control - ?

[lejeczek]

On 29/04/2023 21:02, Reid Wahl wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 3:34 AM lejeczek via Users
> <users at clusterlabs.org> wrote:
>> Hi guys.
>>
>> I presume these are a consequence of having resource of VirtuaDomain type set up(& enabled) - but where, how cab users control presence & content of those?
> Yep: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/blob/v4.12.0/heartbeat/VirtualDomain#L674-L680
>
> You can't really control the content, since it's set by the resource
> agent. (You could change it after creation but that defeats the
> purpose.) However, you can view it at
> /run/systemd/system/resource-agents-deps.target.d/libvirt.conf.
>
> You can see the systemd_drop_in definition here:
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/blob/v4.12.0/heartbeat/ocf-shellfuncs.in#L654-L673
>
I wonder how much of an impact those bits have on the 
cluster(&more?)
Take '99-VirtualDomain-libvirt.conf' - that one poses 
questions, with c9s 'libvirtd.service' is not really used or 
should not be, new modular approach is devised there.
So, with 'resources-agents' having:
After=libvirtd.service
and users not being able to manage those bit - is that not 
asking for trouble?

thanks, L.