[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Preventing a resource from migrating to / starting on a node

[Reid Wahl]

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 7:20 AM Madison Kelly <mkelly at alteeve.com> wrote:
>
> I was taking Ken's advice. Originally my plan was to use location constraints, but I assume Ken's reasoning was sound for the node attribute approach.

Location constraints should work for the simple test case you
presented. There's probably some additional nuance that came up in
your discussion with Ken. Rules and node attributes can be more
flexible when the situation is more complex than just "don't run on
the node with this particular node name".

>
> On 2022-11-29 02:51, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>
> Why can't you use a plain location constraint?
>
> Madison Kelly <mkelly at alteeve.com> schrieb am 29.11.2022 um 05:21 in Nachricht
>
>
> --
> Madison Kelly
> Alteeve's Niche!
> Chief Technical Officer
> c: +1-647-471-0951
> https://alteeve.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Manage your subscription:
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/



-- 
Regards,

Reid Wahl (He/Him)
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat
RHEL High Availability - Pacemaker